In praise of holiday Fordism & why it’s misanthropic to malign mass tourism

August 24, 2021

Dr Butcher defends the much-maligned mass tourist. Image by Kindel Media (CC0) via Pexels. https://www.pexels.com/photo/sea-flight-sunny-beach-8185803/
"Good Tourism" Premier Partnership is for a leading brand in travel & tourism

Nearly every­one wants to escape their every­day and take a hol­i­day, includ­ing work­ing people with small budgets and lim­ited time. Does that mean they, and those who cater to them, are ter­rible people? 

Jim Butcher does­n’t think so. In his third “Good Tour­ism” Insight, Dr Butcher paints mass tour­ism in a pro­gress­ive light and defends the much-maligned mass tourist.

Ford­ism refers to mod­ern man­u­fac­tur­ing that lever­ages the tech­no­logy of the pro­duc­tion line and bene­fits from eco­nom­ies of scale and scope. In this con­text, Henry Ford him­self wrote of the Mod­el T, the exem­plar of the 20th cen­tury’s earli­est pro­duc­tion lines: 

“Any cus­tom­er can have a car painted any col­our that he wants so long as it is black.’’ 

Ford, H (1922) “My Life and Work”

Col­our did­n’t mat­ter. The Mod­el T was afford­able to so many more people than pre­vi­ous motor cars had been. Thus mass con­sump­tion, includ­ing more col­our options, nat­ur­ally fol­lowed from mass production.

This hardly sounds very touristy. As tour­ists, we want to explore our indi­vidu­al­ity and ‘find ourselves’. Yet the prin­ciples of Ford­ism have long been applied to tour­ism. And, far from a stul­ti­fy­ing same­ness, they have con­trib­uted greatly to indi­vidu­al freedom.

Mass tourism: Broadening horizons since the 1840s

Thomas Cook
Thomas Cook. (Source)

‘Hol­i­day Ford­ism’, or mass tour­ism, really pre­cedes Ford. It dates back to the early pion­eers of tour­ism, such as Thomas Cook.

From the 1840s Cook offered domest­ic hol­i­day pack­ages to Bri­tain’s new and expand­ing mar­ket of work­ing class people who had a little dis­pos­able income. Ever since mass tour­ism has grown on the effi­cien­cies of eco­nom­ies of scale and scope, which are real­ised by set­ting up to serve large mar­kets of poten­tial trav­el­lers affordably. 

Ford­ism char­ac­ter­ised inter­na­tion­al tour­ism too. It became for many in Europe the means by which they trav­elled abroad for the first time, and reg­u­larly there­after. The busi­ness mod­el kept prices low and con­trib­uted to the demo­crat­isa­tion of leis­ure travel.

After the second world war the jet engine became the key tech­no­lo­gic­al innov­a­tion shap­ing the travel & tour­ism industry. While air­craft had already linked the source mar­kets of north­ern Europe to the Medi­ter­ranean, jet engines could pro­pel lar­ger air­craft faster. Large and fast air­craft meant great­er scope for eco­nom­ies of scale. 

"On the sands at Blackpool", Hedly Fitton, 1895, for the Manchester Times.
“On the sands at Black­pool”, Hedly Fit­ton, 1895, for the Manchester Times. (Source)

In the 1970s inde­pend­ent charter air­lines, boos­ted by cap­it­al from the ship­ping industry, pion­eered the ‘back to back’ charter (seen as innov­at­ive in its time). 

For Brit­ish tour­ists the pack­age price for a week on the French Rivi­era, the Cos­t­as, the Balear­ics, or a Greek island, became closer to that of a week in Black­pool, Bognor, or Brighton. For many the Med proved prefer­able. The eco­nom­ic and social trans­form­a­tion of poor fish­ing vil­lages was one res­ult. On the whole, hosts and tour­ists benefited.

The French Accor group is also illus­trat­ive of the way Ford­ism and stand­ard­isa­tion enabled grow­ing num­bers of people to travel for leis­ure. Accor pion­eered low cost, highly stand­ard­ised hotels, situ­ated out­side town centres on arter­i­al routes to lower costs yet main­tain access. 

Ini­tially inten­ded for the grow­ing band of car driv­ing trav­el­ling sales­men, Accor’s hotels became pop­u­lar with budget-minded leis­ure trav­el­lers from the 1970s onwards. It became easi­er for French people to vis­it their friends and rel­at­ives who lived in towns and cit­ies away from the prin­ciple tour­ism des­tin­a­tions. Counter-intu­it­ively, hotel stand­ard­isa­tion led to more indi­vidu­al choice.

Also see Jim Butcher­’s “GT” Insights
“Tourism’s demo­crat­ic defi­cit” and
“Why tour­ism degrowth just won’t do after COVID-19”

Hol­i­day resorts can be thought of as Ford­ist too. They encap­su­late scale eco­nom­ies, mass stand­ard­ised trans­it and accom­mod­a­tion, and are shaped around con­veni­ence, access, and con­sumer desires. There is a pejor­at­ive under­cur­rent in some con­tem­por­ary com­ment­ar­ies on such places, espe­cially Medi­ter­ranean resort towns such as Tor­re­moli­nos, Ben­idorm, and Faliraki. They have become bywords for dam­aging mass tour­ism among tourism’s ‘eth­ic­al’ critics. 

Rimini Italy. Taken from the ferris wheel on July 14 2012 by Piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinna CC BY SA 3.0 via Wikimedia
Rimini, Italy. Taken from a Fer­ris wheel in July 2012 by Piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii­inna (CC BY-SA 3.0) via Wiki­me­dia.

The Itali­an resort of Rimini is illus­trat­ive of the fact that the growth of mass tour­ism on the Medi­ter­ranean was not simply a mat­ter of ‘more of the same’. Since 1843, and the found­ing of its first bathing estab­lish­ment, Rimini has been a beach resort town. It has had to adapt to chan­ging cir­cum­stances to vari­ously thrive or sur­vive ever since. 

Rimini’s ini­tial devel­op­ment as a resort in the 19th cen­tury was innov­at­ive, excit­ing, and of its time; a gath­er­ing place for elite wealthy social­ites. By the 1950s and 60s it was a lead­er in fam­ily beach hol­i­days. In response to stag­na­tion in the late 1960s, when Spain and Yugoslavia star­ted offer­ing cheap­er altern­at­ives, Rimini reori­ented itself towards a young­er mar­ket so that by the 1970s and 80s it was the trendy disco cap­it­al of Italy. In the 1990s new ‘MICE’ products served con­fer­ences and trade fairs, and new theme parks attrac­ted fam­il­ies once again.

My moth­er trav­elled to Rimini in the 1960s. For her and her Glaswe­gi­an friends, this was their first des­tin­a­tion out­side the UK, and their first taste of anoth­er cul­ture and lan­guage. For them, Rimini was dis­tant, excit­ing, and exotic.

Is mass tourism akin to ‘comatose consumerism’?

Yet Ford­ist mass tour­ism has been cri­ti­cised in cul­tur­al terms. In the dec­ades after the second world war Frank­furt School thinkers iden­ti­fied Ford­ism with a dumbed down, ‘pro­duced’ cul­ture that stood in the way of the masses under­stand­ing and act­ing on their class interests. 

More recently this sen­ti­ment has been echoed, shorn of the class polit­ics, by aca­dem­ics and cam­paign­ers seek­ing to reign in what they see as tourism’s excesses. For example, one recent account refers to con­sumers con­sum­ing in “robot like fash­ion”, whilst anoth­er to the “comatose con­sumer­ism” of the holidaymaker.

Henn na Hotel Japan where robots have replaced human staff to keep running costs down
What’s more likely, tour­ists becom­ing robots or robots serving tour­ists? At the Henn na Hotel in Japan, as on mod­ern auto­mobile pro­duc­tion lines, robots have replaced human staff to keep run­ning costs down, poten­tially mak­ing such accom­mod­a­tion afford­able to more people. (Source: Henn na Hotel.)

In recent dec­ades tour­ism has moved towards niche tour­ism brands that seek to appeal — some­times self-con­sciously — to tailored, eth­ic­al, and indi­vidu­al pref­er­ences. These niches are often presen­ted not simply as mat­ters of indi­vidu­al wants but as linked to eth­ic­al life­styles. Not infre­quently, they extol the vir­tues of the per­son who would choose to take such a holiday. 

Mass tour­ism for the unthink­ing masses, and niche travel for the cul­tur­ally and envir­on­ment­ally aware, remain all too com­mon tropes in both aca­dem­ic and pop­u­lar com­ment­ary on tour­ism. Travel edit­or Anthony Per­eg­rine has a point when he writes:

“Dis­dain­ing tour­ists is the last per­mit­ted snob­bery, a coded way of dis­tan­cing one­self from the uncul­tured classes.”

‘The Tele­graph’, March 26, 2019

These cari­ca­tures betray a cer­tain dehu­man­isa­tion of the mass tour­ist through the remov­al of their cul­tur­al agency; a recur­ring theme in por­tray­als of mass tour­ists through his­tory. How­ever, crit­ics of hol­i­day Ford­ism today adopt a dif­fer­ent tone to that of the cul­tur­al elites of an earli­er period. 

Back in the 19th cen­tury the loath­ing of the pleas­ure-seek­ing masses was unguarded. The Vic­tori­an diar­ist Rev­er­end Fran­cis Kil­vert fam­ously wrote: 

“Of all nox­ious anim­als, the most nox­ious is a tour­ist. And of all tour­ists the most vul­gar, ill-bred, offens­ive and loath­some is the Brit­ish tourist.” 

Plomer, W (ed) ‘Selec­tions from the Diary of the Rev. Fran­cis Kilvert’

Today it is more likely that mass tour­ists are por­trayed as unthink­ing con­form­ists, lack­ing indi­vidu­al­ity, and in need of enlight­en­ment rather than con­dem­na­tion. Their lack of thought is deemed to have eth­ic­al implic­a­tions, as, without cor­rec­tion, they may dam­age the cul­tures and envir­on­ments they vis­it. In this way, the wide­spread advocacy of eth­ic­al tour­ism since the 1990s — referred to by one aca­dem­ic as ‘the mor­al turn in tour­ism’ — takes as its object of cri­ti­cism the Ford­ist mass tourist.

Tourism choice is something to celebrate

By con­trast, in the 1930s, the Itali­an Marx­ist Ant­o­nio Gram­sci dis­cussed Ford­ism as a pro­gress­ive devel­op­ment. He saw the poten­tial for it to lib­er­ate the major­ity from a life of toil. (He was on the side of my moth­er and her companions.) 

Gram­sci wrote of the lib­er­at­ing char­ac­ter of mass pro­duc­tion for indi­vidu­als in a way that is pres­ci­ent for dis­cus­sions about tour­ism today:

The term “qual­ity” simply means …. Spe­cial­isa­tion for a lux­ury mar­ket. But is this pos­sible for an entire, very pop­u­lous nation? …. Everything that is sus­cept­ible to repro­duc­tion belongs to the realm of quant­ity and can be mass pro­duced … if a nation spe­cial­ises in “qual­ity pro­duc­tion”, what industry provides the goods for the poorer classes? … The whole thing is noth­ing more than a for­mula for idle men of let­ters and for politi­cians whose dem­agogy con­sists of build­ing castles in the air.

Gram­sci, A (1929 – 1935) on Amer­ic­an­ism and Fordism
Antonio Gramsci in the early 1920s
Ant­o­nio Gram­sci (early 1920s). (Source)

It is not­able that Gram­sci refers to ‘qual­ity’ in inver­ted com­mas, tak­ing up crit­ics who see some­thing intrins­ic­ally less­er in mass pro­duc­tion. ‘Qual­ity’ is the adject­ive often adop­ted today to refer to tour­ism that is pro­moted as per­son­al­ised, eth­ic­al, and smal­ler scale. 

How­ever, non-mass tour­ism niches and inde­pend­ent travel depend upon the gains of Ford­ist pro­duc­tion too. Mak­ing mor­al dis­tinc­tions between mass and qual­ity is little more than pious mor­al­ising about oth­ers’ choices. 

Jet tech­no­logy, eco­nom­ies of scale and scope, and eco­nom­ic growth in gen­er­al have under­pinned the geo­graph­ic­al range of tour­ism oppor­tun­it­ies through which an indi­vidu­al can cul­tiv­ate their identity. 

Today the highly stand­ard­ised budget air­lines offer the oppor­tun­ity for many more to travel to a wider vari­ety of places, and to broaden their exper­i­ence of the world. As Air­Asia puts it in its slo­gan: “Now every­one can fly”.

The Ford­ist ‘hol­i­day from the assembly line’ sounds pejor­at­ive, but it is in fact highly lib­er­at­ing. It widens choice and enables count­less pos­sib­il­it­ies. There is noth­ing wrong, and much to cel­eb­rate, in being able to seek tran­quil­lity at a yoga retreat atop a Pyrenean moun­tain, or to go in search of gor­il­las in Rwanda. But asso­ci­at­ing these new niches with a high­er mor­al pur­pose, or a more evolved indi­vidu­al, is unjustified.

Every eth­ic­al niche depends upon the tech­no­logy and wealth borne of our indus­tri­al­ised soci­ety. Whilst cul­tur­ally some may seek to dif­fer­en­ti­ate them­selves from the masses via their leis­ure choices, it is Ford­ist mass pro­duc­tion that has enabled those choices, and the growth in tour­ism for all tastes. That’s some­thing to celebrate.

Agree? Dis­agree? What do you think? Share a short anec­dote or com­ment below. Or write a “GT” Insight of your ownThe “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion about travel & tour­ism because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

Bibliography

Butcher, J (2003) The Mor­al­isa­tion of Tour­ism. Rout­ledge, London.

Gram­sci, A (1929 – 1935) on Amer­ic­an­ism and Ford­ism. In: Hoare, Q (ed) (2005) Selec­tion from the Pris­on Note­books. Lawrence and Wis­hart, London.

Segreto, L; Man­era, C; and Pohl, M (edit­ors) (2009) Europe at the Sea­side: The Eco­nom­ic His­tory of Mass Tour­ism in the Medi­ter­ranean. Berghahn Books, New York.

Fea­tured image (top of post): Image by Kindel Media (CC0) via Pexels.

About the author

Jim Butcher
Jim Butcher

Jim Butcher is a lec­turer and writer who has writ­ten a num­ber of books on the soci­ology and polit­ics of tour­ism. He is now work­ing on a book about mass tour­ism. Dr Butcher blogs at Polit­ics of Tour­ism and tweets at @jimbutcher2.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.