A matter of taste: Travellers, tourists, and ‘tourism for peace’

November 4, 2024

Travellers, tourists, and tourism for peace ... Picture of flat tyre with peace sign hub cap by Charles Pickrell (CC0) via Unsplash.
"Good Tourism" Premier Partnership is for a leading brand in travel & tourism

Does being a ‘trav­el­ler’ or a ‘tour­ist’ have any­thing to do with ‘tour­ism for peace’?

Jim Butcher ques­tions Fabio Car­bone’s cari­ca­ture of arrog­ant tour­ists and his claim that only trav­el­lers hold the keys to world peace. 

It’s a “Good Tour­ism” Insight. (You too can write a “GT” Insight.)

A grand claim

Fabio Car­bone, glob­al ambas­sad­or of the Inter­na­tion­al Insti­tute of Peace Through Tour­ism (a notion endorsed by the United Nations no less), recently made a very grand claim in his art­icle to mark Inter­na­tion­al Tour­ism Day 2024

“Without a doubt, we can sug­gest a caus­al rela­tion­ship between tour­ism and peace. How­ever, it is essen­tial to cla­ri­fy that cer­tain con­di­tions must be met for this to be genu­inely pos­sible, start­ing with the fol­low­ing: the need to bring tour­ism back to its essence — the travel.”

Well, I have some doubts. The last 60 years, the peri­od in which glob­al tour­ism has boomed, has hardly been free of con­flict. But Carbone’s point is that it is neces­sary for us to become ‘trav­el­lers’ rather than ‘tour­ists’ for tour­ism to play this role.

He argues that: 

“[T]ourism in its most com­mon form often reflects — espe­cially among West­ern tour­ists — a super­fi­cial post-his­tor­icism, an ego­centric view that, per­haps uncon­sciously, embod­ies a sense of superi­or­ity with regards to the vis­ited com­munit­ies. In con­trast, trav­el­ling should mean break­ing down those bar­ri­ers and recog­niz­ing that, at the core, we are all equal.”

That the pleas­ure seeker is ego­centric and unin­ter­ested in his­tory is a long-stand­ing cari­ca­ture aimed at people seek­ing to relax and enjoy simple hol­i­day pleasures. 

Con­tents ^

Don’t miss ‘Tour­ist vs trav­el­ler: What’s the dif­fer­ence?

A breed apart

This pejor­at­ive and pess­im­ist­ic view of the tour­ist is as old as mass tour­ism itself. The 1800s fea­tured plenty of the great and the good bemoan­ing the inab­il­ity of the uncul­tured masses to really bene­fit from tourism. 

The stark mor­al dis­tinc­tion drawn between the cul­tured elite and the great unwashed did not go unchal­lenged. Thomas Cook and oth­ers asso­ci­ated tour­ism for the masses with pro­gress; both social and economic. 

You may have assumed that we are past all that. Yet whilst the work­ing classes on their hol­i­days may no longer be talked of lit­er­ally as a breed apart as they were in the 1800s, today’s mor­al­isa­tion of tour­ism accuses them of fail­ing, out of sheer thought­less­ness, to use their hol­i­days to pur­sue world peace and cul­tur­al sensitivity. 

Car­bone is keen to tell us that unlike many of us mere tour­ists, he is a trav­el­ler; one of the thought­ful and caring breed. The glob­al ambas­sad­or does not hold back. 

He sees the tour­ist as nar­ciss­ist­ic, and the trav­el­ler as, poten­tially, vir­tu­ous. The reg­u­lar hol­i­day-maker is asso­ci­ated with “con­sumer­ist­ic incon­tin­ence” and “post-colo­ni­al and post-his­tor­ic arrog­ance”. And while the trav­el­ler takes a genu­ine interest in oth­er people, the tour­ist “thinks he can do without others”. 

This is travel as vir­tue sig­nalling writ large.

Con­tents ^

‘Hell is other people’

His argu­ments do not stack up. 

The mass tour­ism Car­bone frowns upon is noted for its soci­ab­il­ity; its focus on the con­vivi­al com­pany of oth­ers. Trav­el­lers, how­ever, are seek­ing res­pite from some­thing; often oth­er people. Car­bone him­self writes: 

“I avoid tra­di­tion­al tour­ism as much as pos­sible, even as a prac­tice. In solitude, you are free to get lost and truly encounter the real­ity of the place.” 

As Sartre put it, “hell is oth­er people”. 

I’d say that get­ting lost in solitude whilst dis­dain­ing the mass of people enjoy­ing a reg­u­lar hol­i­day is more nar­ciss­ist­ic than any pack­age hol­i­day-maker off to Ben­idorm for sun, lager, and cooked break­fasts. It assumes a mor­al superi­or­ity over oth­ers based purely on one’s taste in holidays. 

Con­tents ^

Don’t miss oth­er “Good Tour­ism” Insights by Dr Jim Butcher

People make tourism

As a tour­ist I am not anti-trav­el­ler in the way many trav­el­lers are anti-tour­ist. I don’t accept this mor­al divide between people who see their hol­i­days as a chance to relax and recu­per­ate with a good nov­el, a swim, and a sun­tan on the one hand, and the back­pack­er strik­ing out on an odys­sey of dis­cov­ery on the oth­er. It’s all good!

I like the sen­ti­ment of the Glas­gow tour­ism mar­ket­ing strap­line: People make Glas­gow’. It is lit­er­ally true for every place inhab­ited by Homo sapi­ens

The retreat into solitude has some­thing to be said for it though. Time alone to gath­er your thoughts, to con­tem­plate mean­ing and appre­ci­ate beauty, is pre­cious. But it is doubly pre­cious when you can, hav­ing con­tem­plated, re-engage with human cul­ture, with all its flaws, pres­sures, beauty, and humanity. 

You’ll miss the lat­ter if you think you are mor­ally super­i­or just because you ‘freed your mind and spir­it’ (got high?) at a Per­uvi­an Ayahuasca eco-retreat or spent a week in a ‘regen­er­at­ive’ tree­house in rur­al Mex­ico.

Con­tents ^

A matter of taste

Car­bone recounts his own travels that involve genu­ine adven­ture. He claims they “put human encoun­ters at the centre of [his] exper­i­ence”. They sound won­der­ful. He is for­tu­nate to have had these incred­ible experiences. 

But to me, being “without con­tacts, without inter­net, without the con­veni­ence of Google Maps, and espe­cially without fuel (!) in the middle of the Ira­ni­an plat­eau, with the nearest city 300 kilo­metres away” is no more human-centred, or to do with ‘the real­ity of the place’, than France’s fam­ily camp­sites, a bust­ling Bar­celona beach­front, or a Man­hat­tan AirBnB. 

Fabio Carbone’s Ecuadori­an adven­tures with machete-wield­ing anaconda hunters are not to everyone’s tastes. And that’s all it is: a mat­ter of taste, not mor­al distinction.

Con­tents ^

Don’t miss oth­er “GT” posts tagged ‘Peace through tour­ism

Tourism for peace?

As for peace through tour­ism, Michael O’Leary, Chair­man of RyanAir and pur­vey­or of cheap flights for the masses, once joked that he should be up for the Nobel peace prize: 

“We’re bring­ing cul­tures togeth­er! There has­n’t been a war in Europe for 50 years because they’re all too busy fly­ing on Ryanair. I should get the Nobel peace prize – screw Bono.” 

Ser­i­ously though, travel is great, if that’s your thing. But it doesn’t make you a bet­ter per­son than a tour­ist. Nor, unfor­tu­nately, does it make the world a more peace­ful place!

Con­tents ^

What do you think? 

Share your own thoughts about ‘tour­ism for peace’ and/or the dif­fer­ences between trav­el­lers and tour­ists  in a com­ment below. 

(SIGN IN or REGISTER first. After sign­ing in you will need to refresh this page to see the com­ments section.)

Or write a “GT” Insight or “GT” Insight Bite of your own. The “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism, because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

“GT” doesn’t judge. “GT” pub­lishes. “GT” is where free thought travels.

If you think the tour­ism media land­scape is bet­ter with “GT” in it, then please …

About the author

Jim Butcher is a lec­turer, and a writer of a num­ber of books on the soci­ology and polit­ics of tour­ism. Dr Butcher blogs at Polit­ics of Tour­ism, tweets at @jimbutcher2, and is the founder of Tourism’s Hori­zon: Travel for the Mil­lions.

Featured image (top of post)

A mat­ter of taste: Trav­el­lers, tour­ists, and ‘tour­ism for peace’ … Pic­ture of flat tyre with peace sign hub cap by Charles Pick­rell (CC0) via Unsplash.

Top ^

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.