How New Zealand’s Tiaki Promise advances regenerative travel & tourism

April 8, 2021

Dolphin tiaki promise inset within a view from Roy’s Peak, Wanaka, New Zealand. Photo by Jasper van der Meij (CC0) via Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/k7D1O46HPwA
Click here for your invitation to write for "Good Tourism" ... Feel free to pass it on.

Inde­pend­ent research­er Bron­wyn Hutchis­on takes a look at New Zeal­and’s des­tin­a­tion care pledge, the Tiaki Prom­ise, and its poten­tial for advan­cing regen­er­at­ive travel & tour­ism. It’s a “Good Tour­ism” Insight.

[Thanks to Regina Scheyvens for invit­ing Ms Hutchis­on to write a “GT” Insight.]

The COVID-19 pan­dem­ic has wreaked hav­oc on domest­ic and inter­na­tion­al tour­ism world­wide. But tour­ism has been wreak­ing its own hav­oc on the envir­on­ment and host com­munit­ies across the plan­et for dec­ades. Des­pite years of sus­tain­able devel­op­ment talk, tour­ism has con­tin­ued to be struc­tured around sus­tain­ing growth ahead of respect­ing the envir­on­ment and the pri­or­it­ies of host communities. 

The pan­dem­ic has giv­en host com­munit­ies the oppor­tun­ity to pause and express what it is they want from tour­ism. The answer is that it’s not all about more tour­ists.

To restore bal­ance to tour­ism and recog­nise the inter­con­nec­ted real­it­ies of people and the plan­et we must appre­ci­ate that tour­ism is part of a com­plex sys­tem. A regen­er­at­ive tour­ism approach does just that and New Zealand’s Tiaki Prom­ise is a facil­it­at­ing ele­ment of such a system.

What is regeneration and regenerative development?

Regen­er­a­tion is the self-renew­ing pro­cess nat­ur­al sys­tems use to thrive and adapt long-term. Regen­er­at­ive devel­op­ment, then, aims for flour­ish­ing human and envir­on­ment­al well-being that goes bey­ond sus­tain­ing the status quo. 

Regen­er­at­ive devel­op­ment replaces a lin­ear way of think­ing with a self-sus­tain­ing one. It is more pro­act­ive in estab­lish­ing pos­it­ive out­comes than sus­tain­able devel­op­ment, which tends towards min­im­ising neg­at­ive out­comes. Regen­er­at­ive devel­op­ment recog­nises the inter­re­lated­ness of humans with each oth­er and the nat­ur­al world and, crit­ic­ally, that humans are not the super­i­or parts of the system. 

Also see Susanne Beck­en & Dav­id Gill­banks’ “GT” Insight
“Regen­er­at­ive tour­ism vs sus­tain­able tour­ism: What’s the difference?”

When apply­ing regen­er­at­ive prin­ciples to tour­ism it is appar­ent that we need to recon­sider how we frame tour­ism and its pri­or­it­ies to reflect this under­stand­ing. How­ever, tour­ism is a com­plex sys­tem made up of many inter­act­ing parts that have qual­it­at­ive values. 

Endur­ing change is neither quick nor easy.

How to change a system

What is required to change a sys­tem is a change in the paradigm from which the sys­tem comes; a change in the mind­set that determ­ines its pur­pose and pri­or­it­ies. Regen­er­at­ive tour­ism thus requires a change from view­ing tour­ism as an extract­ive sys­tem — tak­ing everything it can from host envir­on­ments and com­munit­ies — to a regen­er­at­ive sys­tem that enables flourishing. 

Part of this refram­ing is no longer view­ing tour­ists as con­sumers with spe­cial priv­ileges. The social con­tract between vis­it­ors and hosts needs to be developed so that com­munity needs and val­ues are pri­or­it­ised, includ­ing those of Indi­gen­ous peoples. One way to do this is through cre­at­ing a com­mon cul­ture of social norms that are at once empower­ing and hope­ful. This is what the Tiaki Prom­ise seeks to do.

Also see Dav­id Gill­banks’
“Has ‘Future of Tour­ism’ failed host communities?”

What is the Tiaki Promise?

The Tiaki Prom­ise was intro­duced into Aotearoa (New Zea­l­and) in Novem­ber 2018 by sev­en organ­isa­tions: Air New Zea­l­and, the Depart­ment of Con­ser­va­tion, Loc­al Gov­ern­ment New Zea­l­and, New Zea­l­and Maori Tour­ism, Tour­ism Hold­ings Ltd, Tour­ism Industry Aotearoa, and Tour­ism New Zea­l­and. It was largely a response to com­plaints by res­id­ents about the bad beha­viour of tour­ists — par­tic­u­larly free­dom campers dis­respect­ing the envir­on­ment and self-drive tour­ists involved in road acci­dents — and per­cep­tions of over­tour­ism in some places.

Tiaki means to care for people and place. The Tiaki Prom­ise is a com­mit­ment to care for New Zea­l­and now and for future generations. 

The Tiaki Prom­ise is one of a num­ber of des­tin­a­tion pledges recently intro­duced to pos­it­ively influ­ence tour­ist beha­viour. This type of com­mon cause cul­ture facil­it­ates sys­tems health by cre­at­ing a pos­it­ive, val­ues-based con­nec­tion that encour­ages long-term beha­vi­our­al change. From a sys­tems approach, the Tiaki Prom­ise alters tour­ists’ inner paradigms of pur­pose and reorders the pri­or­it­ies of tour­ism sys­tem stake­hold­ers so that both align with the needs and wants of host communities.

Broken promise?

The Tiaki Prom­ise is aspir­a­tion­al. It is an example of how one might facil­it­ate regen­er­at­ive tour­ism at the com­munity level. But sys­tem­ic regen­er­a­tion must take place at all levels. And it is clear there is a long way to go. 

Also see Josie Major’s “GT” Insight
“How to change an icon­ic travel & tour­ism exper­i­ence … for good”

In March 2021, Air New Zealand’s chief envir­on­ment­al advisor Sir Jonath­an Por­ritt pos­ited his sup­port for increas­ing the cost of inter­na­tion­al flights to pay for green­house gas emis­sions. Sir Por­ritt was repor­ted as say­ing that he is in favour of dis­cour­aging irre­spons­ible air travel, that he does not believe the num­ber of inter­na­tion­al vis­it­ors to New Zea­l­and can simply con­tin­ue to grow without lim­its, and that the avi­ation industry urgently needs to reduce its emissions. 

Less than two weeks later, it was repor­ted that Air New Zea­l­and will not only restore flights to its net­work of nine Aus­trali­an cit­ies but also add a new Aus­trali­an des­tin­a­tion. Con­tin­ued growth means a con­tinu­ing increase in emis­sions, more tour­ists, and more envir­on­ment­al dam­age. While an emis­sions tax can help fund cli­mate change pro­jects it can­not change the fact that air travel is a sig­ni­fic­ant con­trib­ut­or to cli­mate change in the first place. There is also Air New Zealand’s 10-hour sight­see­ing flight to see the Aurora Aus­tral­is; a prime example of irre­spons­ible air travel and anoth­er indic­a­tion of the lack of any real com­mit­ment to envir­on­ment­al issues.

The Tiaki Prom­ise can facil­it­ate the alter­ing of inner paradigms and feed into a regen­er­at­ive tour­ism sys­tem, but even a healthy sys­tem is sus­cept­ible to intru­sion from stronger forces. Thus the ‘I do’ of accept­ing the Tiaki Prom­ise must become ‘we do’, includ­ing cor­por­a­tions and gov­ern­ments. For it is only by act­ing togeth­er that the poten­tial human and envir­on­ment­al flour­ish­ing through a regen­er­at­ive tour­ism sys­tem can be a reality.

What do you think? Share a short anec­dote or com­ment below. Or write a deep­er “GT” InsightThe “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

Fea­tured image (top of post): Tiaki Prom­ise dol­phin (from Tiaki Prom­ise web­site) inset with­in a view from Roy’s Peak, Wana­ka, New Zea­l­and (by Jasper van der Meij (CC0) via Unsplash).

About the author

Bronwyn Hutchison sq
Bron­wyn Hutchison

Bron­wyn Hutchis­on is an inde­pend­ent research­er who is com­plet­ing her mas­ters on regen­er­at­ive tour­ism through Mas­sey Uni­ver­sity in New Zea­l­and. Ms Hutchis­on has a par­tic­u­lar interest in Indi­gen­ous tour­ism, and the role of tour­ism in gender empowerment.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.