In the eye of the beholder: How to create valuable tourism experiences

January 21, 2021

Flowers, cosmos, and the eye of the beholder. By DanielHannah (CC0) via Pixabay. https://pixabay.com/illustrations/eye-creative-galaxy-collage-4997724/
"Good Tourism" Premier Partnership is for a leading brand in travel & tourism

Set­ting prices, drum­ming up demand, and deliv­er­ing appro­pri­ate value-for-money are core chal­lenges for travel & tour­ism stake­hold­ers, par­tic­u­larly in des­tin­a­tions wor­ried about a post-COV­ID return to over­tour­ism. An easy way to reduce demand might be for gov­ern­ments to increase tour­ism taxes and/or for busi­nesses to raise prices, but will the value still be there? 

“Good Tour­ism” Insight Part­ner Plan­et Hap­pi­ness invited psy­cho­lo­gist Bjørn Z Eke­lund to share how he looks at the problem.

From 2010 – 2012, I was invited to take part in Innov­at­ive Exper­i­ences, a tour­ism research and devel­op­ment pro­gram in Nor­way’s north. Dur­ing one of the field days, I was with a museum eth­no­lo­gist friend at a res­taur­ant that served loc­al cod. On our way through the eat­ery, we passed by a blanket hanging on a wall next to a table of diners. My friend stopped at the table and asked the group: “Do you know any­thing about this blanket?” When there was no answer, she star­ted to explain that it was a loc­al blanket made for fish­er­men who spent dark wet dark nights out in open boats. The loc­ally-weaved blanket allowed the fish­er­folk to keep warm even when it was rain­ing. It was a tra­di­tion­al blanket for the fish­ers of the area. 

My friend was proud of the blanket and enjoyed explain­ing its cul­tur­al her­it­age. As she kept on talk­ing, I sud­denly put my hand over her mouth and said: “Maybe we should listen to what’s these people think?” The people at the table looked at each oth­er for a moment and one of them said: “You know, I have an uncle back home in south­ern Nor­way. He was a fish­er­man too. His way of solv­ing this prob­lem was a bit dif­fer­ent. I think he was more con­cerned about get­ting back home when it rained. Maybe because his fish­ing grounds were not that far from the coast. I’ll have to ask him when I get home.”

This story illus­trates one of the main learn­ing points of our research and devel­op­ment pro­gram. Our over­all goal was to increase value-cre­ation in tour­ism, espe­cially inter­na­tion­al tour­ism. Our main research ques­tion focused upon the pro­pos­i­tion that identi­fy­ing new and dif­fer­ent types of added value would help a des­tin­a­tion set high­er prices and boost loc­al earnings. 

Tore Forsberg has a passion for old tools and traditions. Here he lends his expertise to Oseberg Viking Heritage, a cultural heritage project in Tonsberg, southern Norway. This is where skilled shipwrights build replicas of Viking vessels, including the "most beautiful" Oseberg. Image supplied by Bjørn Z Ekelund.
Tore Fors­berg has a pas­sion for old tools and tra­di­tions. Here he lends his expert­ise to Ose­berg Vik­ing Her­it­age, a cul­tur­al her­it­age pro­ject in Tons­berg, south­ern Nor­way. This is where skilled ship­wrights build rep­licas of Vik­ing ves­sels, includ­ing the “most beau­ti­ful” Ose­berg. Image sup­plied by Bjørn Z Ekelund.

How do we set prices for cultural heritage tourism experiences?

How should prices be set? Here are three alternatives:

  1. Based on the cost of an object and its related phys­ic­al costs (for example, the blanket hanging in the res­taur­ant or objects in a museum);
  2. Based on the cost of hav­ing a trained per­son tell a story about an object (for example, my eth­no­lo­gist friend or a museum guide); or,
  3. Based on the value cre­ated for the vis­it­or when they reflect on their own life exper­i­ences and perspectives.

These three altern­at­ives rep­res­ent dif­fer­ent per­spect­ives in value cre­ation for tour­ists in a cul­tur­al her­it­age con­text. Is the object and its phys­ic­al present­a­tion of primary interest and value? Or is it the story being told? Or is it the trav­el­ler­’s exper­i­ence and reflections? 

This is an area of tour­ism research inspired by an eco­nom­ic mod­el focused on sub­ject­ive exper­i­en­tial value; that which is cre­ated in the vis­it­or’s mind. It was inspired by Finnish tour­ism industry mod­els and the­or­ists focus­ing on what is called the “exper­i­ence eco­nomy”. (See Pine & Gilmore, 1998).

In our research pro­ject, while we were unable to identi­fy pre­cise val­ues that could be charged for each “vis­it­or exper­i­ence” at cul­tur­al her­it­age sites, we con­cluded two things: 

  1. Tour­ist guides can be trained to identi­fy extraordin­ary moments of flow and enlight­en­ment among their cli­ents; and, 
  2. It is pos­sible to recog­nise these extraordin­ary “peak exper­i­ence” moments and to share them with oth­er vis­it­ors and site colleagues. 

With appro­pri­ate sys­tems in place, cul­tur­al her­it­age site man­agers can insti­tu­tion­al­ise learn­ing pro­cesses and identi­fy oppor­tun­it­ies through spaces, objects, and stor­ies to max­im­ise the qual­ity and value of the vis­it­or experience. 

Moreover, by learn­ing from tour­ists who wish to tell their own stor­ies, and ask­ing ques­tions about their exper­i­ence and how they would add value (for cur­rent and future vis­it­ors), sites and attrac­tions will not only be able to improve their exper­i­en­tial product, but also bene­fit from great­er word-of-the mouth refer­rals when trav­el­lers return home. 

To sum­mar­ise, while we were unable to identi­fy pre­cise val­ues for high­er prices, we were able to stim­u­late increased value cre­ation that would gen­er­ate extra demand through word-of-mouth referrals. 

Reflect­ing on this know­ledge, I was reminded of the say­ing: “Beauty is in the eye of the behold­er.” It implies that beauty does not exist on its own; rather it is a cre­ation of the mind of the observ­er. This became the essence of our renewed focus. It was now no longer about the blanket on the wall, nor stor­ies about the blanket, but rather what was going on in the minds of our tour­ists and visitors.

How do we create cultural heritage tourism value in ‘the eye of the beholder’?

Our focus shif­ted to the ques­tion: “What is needed to amp­li­fy value-cre­ation in the eye of the behold­er?” We iden­ti­fied and developed two ways to facil­it­ate deep­er, more mean­ing­ful vis­it­or exper­i­ences, and, through stronger word-of-mouth, gen­er­ate great­er demand for qual­ity vis­it­or experiences:

Firstly, we developed train­ing for tour guides to help them under­stand the value in relat­ing to and empath­ising with the cli­ent; to under­stand what’s import­ant to them. For this train­ing we applied a concept called the Diversity Icebreak­er. We intro­duced the con­cepts of flow, flour­ish­ing, enlight­en­ment, and mean­ing­ful learn­ing, which included:

  • Learn­ing about inter­na­tion­al and cross-cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences in com­mu­nic­a­tion; and 
  • An intro­duc­tion to ways organ­isa­tions can learn from indi­vidu­al experiences.

Secondly, we designed a manu­al for site man­agers to sup­port learn­ing pro­cesses among tour guides. This presen­ted examples of how to mag­ni­fy vis­it­or exper­i­ences through storytelling and cre­at­ing diar­ies where vis­it­or exper­i­ences could be recor­ded plus digit­al and online plat­forms where stor­ies could be shared. This last part included ele­ments of product devel­op­ment to increase the value of the vis­it­or exper­i­ence onsite and through digit­al marketing.

For me the story about the blanket in the res­taur­ant turned into a story about the trav­el­ler­’s life. It illus­trated how storytelling, inter­pret­a­tion, and two-way engage­ment in cul­tur­al her­it­age sites can add sig­ni­fic­ant value as vis­it­ors will bet­ter under­stand them­selves, the world around them, and the com­munit­ies they visit. 

A note about Planet Happiness

planet happiness logo 300w x 250h

Plan­et Hap­pi­ness, which kindly invited me to share my thoughts with The “Good Tour­ism” Blog, is a thought-pro­vok­ing and inspir­ing pro­ject with a broad per­spect­ive that focuses our minds on the qual­it­ies of a host community’s phys­ic­al, social, and psy­cho­lo­gic­al well-being. While its focus con­trasts with my exper­i­ence above, there are not neces­sar­ily any con­flicts. I believe our approaches are com­ple­ment­ary and highly syn­er­gist­ic, and provide a found­a­tion for integ­rat­ing import­ant les­sons from our work. 

Plan­et Hap­pi­ness encour­ages com­munit­ies to think about whole tour­ism sys­tems, includ­ing product devel­op­ment pro­cesses that sup­port com­munity well-being and more mean­ing­ful and pur­pose­ful vis­it­or exper­i­ences. It is this lat­ter cat­egory that espe­cially excites me! Does it also open your mind to new oppor­tun­it­ies and poten­tial? I look for­ward to adding these per­spect­ives to my work and enga­ging with Plan­et Happiness.

What do you think? Share a short anec­dote or com­ment below. Or write a deep­er “GT” InsightThe “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

Fea­tured image (top of post): Flowers, cos­mos, and the eye of the behold­er. By Daniel­Han­nah (CC0) via Pixabay.

About the author

Bjørn Z Ekelund, psychologist, founder of consulting company Human Factors AS
Bjørn Z Ekelund

Bjørn Z Eke­lund is the founder of con­sult­ing com­pany Human Factors AS. A psy­cho­lo­gist by pro­fes­sion, Bjørn wrote his dis­ser­ta­tion in 1983 on the sub­ject of sub­ject­ive well-being. With 35 years of exper­i­ence as a con­sult­ant in cross-cul­tur­al man­age­ment, team-work, and psy­cho­lo­gic­al assess­ment, his work in the tour­ism industry includes Innov­at­ive Exper­i­ences, the pro­ject in north­ern Nor­way that he refers to in this post. 

Thanks to “Good Tour­ism” Insight Part­ner Plan­et Hap­pi­ness for invit­ing Bjørn to con­trib­ute this “GT” Insight.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.