Five insights that could move tourism closer to sustainability: Lecturer

February 21, 2019

insights sustainable toursm destination Rotorua Hotpool New Zealand Thermal Wonderland
Click here for your invitation to write for "Good Tourism" ... Feel free to pass it on.

Jason Paul Mika of Mas­sey Uni­ver­sity shares five insights on the role of tour­ism in sus­tain­able development:

Tour­ism is New Zealand’s biggest export earner, con­trib­ut­ing 21% of for­eign exchange earn­ings. The latest data show tour­ists added NZ$39.1 bil­lion to the eco­nomy and the industry has seen a 44% increase over the past five years.

But tour­ism also brings unwanted pres­sures on infra­struc­ture and nat­ur­al resources. Recently, a con­fer­ence focused on sus­tain­ab­il­ity in tour­ism and how the industry could con­trib­ute to the United Nations’ 17 sus­tain­able devel­op­ment goals (SDGs), rat­i­fied in 2015 as the play­book for glob­al devel­op­ment to 2030. 

The meet­ing chal­lenged the growth agenda that con­tin­ues to dom­in­ate think­ing in the tour­ism industry. The rhet­or­ic around the SDGs came under fire for being based on ideas of util­it­ari­an­ism (max­im­ising growth and profits) and mana­geri­al­ism (all prob­lems are solv­able with good management).

An uneasy ten­sion was evid­ent in how sus­tain­ab­il­ity is viewed. On the one hand, the nar­rat­ive was one of hope­less­ness because sus­tain­ab­il­ity in tour­ism is con­stantly counter-punched by com­mer­cial­ism and inequal­it­ies between loc­als and out­siders. On the oth­er hand, there was hope. Sus­tain­ab­il­ity in tour­ism should be pos­sible because cor­por­ates allude to re-ima­gined approaches to social respons­ib­il­ity and indi­gen­ous tour­ism oper­at­ors see SDGs as com­pat­ible with their val­ues and needs.

Here are five major insights on the role of tour­ism in sus­tain­able development.

1) The SDGs are not infallible

They are full of con­tra­dic­tions and ten­sions, and born of an insti­tu­tion of ulti­mate com­prom­ise – the United Nations. The UN advances pro­gress based on a “middle ground” approach. For now, the SDGs rep­res­ent accep­ted wis­dom about what a good life might look like in 2030.

2) Sustainability means change

Sus­tain­ab­il­ity requires a change in mind­set, beliefs, assump­tions, habits and beha­viours – not just of some, but every­one. Every­body stands to lose if we do not achieve a more sus­tain­able world.

Accord­ing to ancient indi­gen­ous wis­dom, we are all inter­con­nec­ted, and the UN is begin­ning to appre­ci­ate that. The real chal­lenge is how we insti­tute a shift toward sus­tain­ab­il­ity, after gen­er­a­tions of mar­ket-driv­en eco­nom­ics that will not eas­ily release us from its grasp. Like dur­ing all major dis­rup­tions, we must address root causes to pro­cure last­ing effects. 

In eco­nom­ic par­lance, achiev­ing a shift from growth to sus­tain­ab­il­ity requires us to rethink the incent­ives and rules (car­rots and sticks) we use to guide entre­pren­eurs and enter­prises. We might see sus­tain­ab­il­ity rise in the entrepreneur’s estim­a­tion because of nat­ur­al cata­strophes, abhor­rence at wide­spread poverty, and when con­sumers demand it.

3) We are a long way off

Com­pan­ies and poli­cy­makers are a long way off work­ing out how to do the SDGs justice, but some are mak­ing a pretty good start. One glob­al tour­ism oper­at­or, for example, imme­di­ately after a major earth­quake in one of its prime des­tin­a­tions raised $400,000 from an appeal. They also believed that get­ting tour­ists to return would offer longer term bene­fits to loc­als, so donated 100% of the profits from travel to the region in the year after the quake to the rebuild. Their philo­sophy: profit first, then pur­pose fol­lows. More growth enables the com­pany to do more good. This makes sense because you can­not help any­one if you don’t have the money. But if you wait until you have money to have pur­pose, then sus­tain­ab­il­ity is merely about eco­nom­ic attain­ment, only one strand of the many ideals with­in the SDGs. We should, instead, be aim­ing for ‘inclus­ive tour­ism’ which moves us some way toward tour­ism being the trans­form­at­ive, part­ner­ship-centred, equit­able bene­fit-shar­ing between com­pan­ies and loc­al com­munit­ies that might sus­tain people and envir­on­ments over generations.

4) Indigenous perspective

Indi­gen­ous know­ledge presents altern­at­ive sets of val­ues and beha­viours that are inher­ently sus­tain­able and offer poten­tial mod­els.

Indi­gen­ous com­munit­ies are often deprived of oppor­tun­ity and resources to devel­op sus­tain­able enter­prises of their own. Some indi­gen­ous entre­pren­eurs who start their own enter­prises are affected by pub­lic doubt about wheth­er they can or should do it. There is also the issue of how indi­gen­ous lands should be used – either for large-scale for­eign-owned resorts that usu­ally pre­clude loc­al own­er­ship or for small-scale loc­ally-owned ones that are access­ible to locals.

5) Customer power

As tour­ists, tour­ism oper­at­ors and tour­ism agen­cies, we ought to be pre­pared to look bey­ond the idyll­ic post card images to under­stand the undesir­able con­sequences of tour­ism: waste, work­ing con­di­tions, water qual­ity and impacts on the envir­on­ment. It is import­ant we become dis­cern­ing cus­tom­ers who ask about sus­tain­ab­il­ity of products and services.

This art­icle by Jason Paul Mika, Seni­or Lec­turer, School of Man­age­ment, Mas­sey Uni­ver­sity, was ori­gin­ally pub­lished on The Con­ver­sa­tion, Janu­ary 16, 2019. It has been repub­lished on the “GT” Blog under a Cre­at­ive Com­mons license. (The “GT” Blog used a dif­fer­ent image.) Read the ori­gin­al art­icle.

Fea­tured image: Rotorua hot­pool. Could Jason Paul Mika’s five insights help move tour­ism closer to sus­tain­ab­il­ity (and away from hot water)? (CC0 from Max Pixel)

The Conversation

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.