Terrorism and tourism’s diabolical relationship

November 17, 2017

Terrorism and tourism's diabolical relationship
Click here for your invitation to write for "Good Tourism" ... Feel free to pass it on.

Ayşegül Acar, research assist­ant at Kar­abük Uni­ver­sity, Tur­key, and doc­tor­al stu­dent at Istan­bul Uni­ver­sity, explores the dis­com­fit­ing rela­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and tour­ism in this “GT” Insight.

Bombs explod­ing one after anoth­er, vehicles plough­ing through masses of people, media cov­er­age, and the responses of those in power; they all cre­ate ten­sion, inter­na­tion­al con­flict, dis­order, and polit­ic­al instability.

For tour­ism, an industry of peace, ter­ror­ism undoubtedly does great harm. As a mat­ter of fact, the tour­ism indus­tries of coun­tries most greatly affected by ter­ror­ism often fall flat in the after­math of each attack; a tech­nic­al knock out in box­ing terms.

Today ter­ror­ism often tar­gets tour­ist des­tin­a­tions and events. Apart from provid­ing easy or “soft” tar­gets, why is tour­ism such an attract­ive tar­get for terrorists?

The media’s relationship with terrorism

The oft-cited belief that “one person’s ter­ror­ist is anoth­er per­son’s free­dom fight­er” blurs our under­stand­ing of ter­ror­ism. Even if the object­ives of ter­ror­ists them­selves dif­fer from one to anoth­er, ter­ror­ist activ­it­ies in gen­er­al can be gathered with­in three basic tac­tic­al objectives:

  1. Pub­li­city (to pub­li­cise a mes­sage, a voice);
  2. Polit­ic­al instabil­ity (to hurt the legit­im­acy of the cur­rent regime in a coun­try); and
  3. Eco­nom­ic harm (to inflict mater­i­al pres­sure on the pub­lic and their leaders).

While eco­nom­ic harm is of greatest con­cern to the tour­ism industry, it may be pos­sible to explain mod­ern ter­ror­ism by invest­ig­at­ing the role of the mass media. It can be argued that the media has served to escal­ate the num­ber of viol­ent ter­ror­ist acts since the early 1970s.

Firstly, let us eval­u­ate the four basic ele­ments of the com­mu­nic­a­tion pro­cess in the con­text of ter­ror­ism. That is, the mes­sen­ger (the ter­ror­ist), the recip­i­ent (the polit­ic­al tar­get of the ter­ror­ist act), the mes­sage (the ter­ror­ist act itself involving indi­vidu­al or insti­tu­tion­al vic­tims), and the feed­back (the response of the recipient).

Let us illus­trate this in a scen­ario that we all are famil­i­ar with in the con­text of travel & tour­ism. Let’s sup­pose that ter­ror­ists hijack an air­liner. In this case the ter­ror­ists would ini­ti­ate the com­mu­nic­a­tion. The tar­get of these ter­ror­ists’ mes­sage is most prob­ably a gov­ern­ment. The pas­sen­gers in the air­liner and the hijack­ing itself will serve as the mes­sage which is likely to con­tain cer­tain requests. Should the tar­geted gov­ern­ment act in accord­ance with the ter­ror­ists’ requests, we would expect the ter­ror­ists to con­sider their com­mu­nic­a­tion successful.

Through it all the mass media acts as an amp­li­fi­er; turn­ing up the volume on the com­mu­nic­a­tion; allow­ing many more people to hear the mes­sage than would oth­er­wise be pos­sible. Thus by amp­li­fy­ing and accel­er­at­ing the spread of news, the mass media has turned ter­ror­ism into a cost-effect­ive means of com­mu­nic­a­tion by those determ­ined to con­vey their mes­sage by any means necessary.

This played out dur­ing the Palestini­an attack on the 1972 Munich Olympic Games, which caused the death of 11 Israeli sol­diers. The Olympics is a high-pro­file event involving the par­ti­cip­a­tion of not only ath­letes, but also polit­ic­al and media rep­res­ent­at­ives from most of the world’s nations. The events in Munich were wit­nessed by nearly 800 mil­lion tele­vi­sion view­ers around the world and con­veyed a mes­sage about Israel’s occu­pa­tion of Palestine.

Thus, through the par­ti­cip­a­tion of mass media, a rela­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and travel & tour­ism was born. Since then the media has made ter­ror acts become almost famil­i­ar or “com­mon” incid­ents that can be encountered any­time and any­where. The fact that ter­ror­ism is “nor­mal” nowadays has made extraordin­ary secur­ity meas­ures, par­tic­u­larly at air­ports, a per­man­ent and accept­able part of life.

terrorism and tourism's diabolocal relationship; an example
Turk­ish police secure the area after an explo­sion in the cent­ral Istan­bul Sul­ta­nah­met dis­trict on Janu­ary 12, 2016 in Istan­bul, Tur­key. (Photo by Can Erok/Getty Images)

How can terrorism and tourism be related to each other?

How can there be a close rela­tion­ship, a com­mon point, between these two very dif­fer­ent con­cepts; one con­struct­ive and one destruct­ive? Explor­ing the rela­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and tour­ism will make it easi­er to under­stand why ter­ror­ists tar­get tourists.

Ter­ror­ism and tour­ism both cross nation­al bound­ar­ies, involve cit­izens of dif­fer­ent coun­tries, and bene­fit from travel and com­mu­nic­a­tion tech­no­lo­gies. In fact, ter­ror­ists inten­tion­ally tar­get tour­ists or tour­ism because it is an effect­ive way for the ter­ror­ists to reach their tar­gets. Tour­ists are tar­geted since they sym­bol­ic­ally rep­res­ent their coun­try and tar­get gov­ern­ments. The murder of a Jew­ish-Amer­ic­an pas­sen­ger on the Achille Lauro cruise ship, which was hijacked by Palestini­ans in 1985, is a demon­stra­tion of this.

In fact the pro­cess is very simple from a terrorist’s point of view. As products of dog­mat­ic thought and the rep­res­ent­at­ives and advoc­ates of cer­tain points of view, ter­ror­ists do not hes­it­ate to turn to tour­ism areas. There they can hide in plain sight. Large groups of tour­ists, who speak for­eign lan­guages and are as strange and dif­fer­ent to loc­als as they are to each oth­er, provide cov­er for ter­ror­ists who can wander among them without rais­ing sus­pi­cion. Present­ing as tour­ists them­selves, ter­ror­ists can shop using for­eign cur­ren­cies, stop and look at things, and take pic­tures, just as tour­ists do, as they scope out a tar­get and plan their attack.

Ter­ror­ists, who want to be recog­nised for their polit­ic­al points of view, see viol­ent acts and the pub­li­city they bring as a means to over­come cen­sor­ship or to under­score a sense of urgency. Ter­ror­ists know that to tar­get the cit­izens of mul­tiple coun­tries will attract more media atten­tion than if they tar­get only loc­als. With the inter­na­tion­al media interest that brings, their polit­ic­al issue is quickly elev­ated into a glob­al con­cern, which in turn raises ques­tions about the legit­im­acy of their tar­get gov­ern­ment or insti­tu­tion. The good pub­li­city for the ter­ror­ist is obvi­ously very bad for tour­ism, which has flow-on effects to the rest of the economy.

So, if we sum­mar­ize it, ter­ror­ists tar­get tour­ists to accom­plish their stra­tegic goals of pub­li­city, polit­ic­al instabil­ity, and eco­nom­ic harm.

Tourism as a trigger

Of course it is not always true to asso­ci­ate ter­ror­ists and ter­ror acts with organ­isa­tions with rad­ic­al polit­ic­al views or from dif­fer­ent coun­tries. Some­times tour­ism itself can trig­ger violence.

For example, let’s con­sider a coun­try or region where divis­ive con­flicts arise between those who sup­port tour­ism devel­op­ment and those who oppose it. Ideas that tour­ism is respons­ible for the dis­rup­tion of loc­al industry and the cor­rup­tion of loc­al cul­ture, and per­cep­tions that tour­ism devel­op­ment does not bene­fit (or even harms) loc­al people, can polar­ise soci­ety and trig­ger viol­ence. In these cases it is import­ant to note that those who are involved in tour­ism devel­op­ment must act sens­it­ively and respons­ibly with the under­stand­ing that poorly con­ceived tour­ism can lead to bad, even viol­ent, reac­tions among some people in a destination.

Fur­ther­more, tour­ists them­selves should be made aware that socio-eco­nom­ic, cul­tur­al, and com­mu­nic­a­tion dif­fer­ences between them and their hosts can cause anger and trig­ger viol­ence. Tour­ists who, for example, show off their wealth, flag­rantly dis­respect loc­al cus­toms, or make unreas­on­able demands based on their own cul­tur­al expect­a­tions, may irrit­ate loc­al people, con­trib­ute to a build-up of anger, and cause viol­ent or ter­ror­ist actions when this anger is expressed in a dan­ger­ous way.

The economic harms of violence against tourism

Of course, it is inev­it­able that viol­ence no mat­ter its cause or motiv­a­tion, impacts eco­nom­ic devel­op­ment. Growth rates, for­eign trade rev­en­ues, exports, for­eign dir­ect invest­ments, and all oth­er inter­na­tion­al activ­it­ies of coun­tries sub­ject to ter­ror­ist acts are affected neg­at­ively. One of the most import­ant sources of for­eign exchange rev­en­ue for many coun­tries is tour­ism, espe­cially in devel­op­ing coun­tries where the income is very import­ant for solv­ing prob­lems such as unem­ploy­ment and liquidity.

It’s also worth remem­ber­ing that one of the big reas­ons that ter­ror­ists tar­get tour­ists is that if tour­ism is sup­por­ted by the state, or if the state relies upon tour­ism rev­en­ues, attacks against tour­ism will be per­ceived as attacks against the state. Since the tour­ism sec­tor is an import­ant source of eco­nom­ic activ­ity, ter­ror­ist attacks aimed at tour­ists will cause a decrease in for­eign exchange rev­en­ue pla­cing an extra eco­nom­ic bur­den on the government.

terrorism and tourism implications
The famed Sul­tan Ahmed Mosque or Sul­tan Ahmet Mosque or Blue Mosque in Istan­bul, Tur­key … deser­ted. (Pic sup­plied by author)

When did terror meet tourism?

Actu­ally, I gave the answer to this ques­tion earli­er. Yes, ter­ror and tour­ism were pain­fully intro­duced for the first time at the Munich Olympics in 1972. Since then they have con­tin­ued to meet. Let’s take a brief look at cases where ter­ror­ists have spe­cific­ally tar­geted tourism:

As a res­ult of the ter­ror­ist attack in the Val­ley of the Kings, Egypt in 1997, the tour­ism sec­tor suffered an estim­ated $ 1 bil­lion loss. The 700,000 people employed by the industry and close to 7 mil­lion cit­izens suffered eco­nom­ic­ally from the attack. Occu­pancy rates remained depressed for about two years.

One of the most strik­ing examples of ter­ror­is­m’s impact on a coun­try’s eco­nomy and tour­ism is undoubtedly the “Septem­ber 11” attacks in the US in 2001 in which four air­liners were hijacked and then aimed at tar­gets includ­ing the twin towers of the World Trade Cen­ter in New York as well as a “hard” tar­get, the Pentagon. Imme­di­ately after the attacks, in addi­tion to a decrease in the num­ber of domest­ic tour­ists, a sig­ni­fic­ant decrease in the num­ber of for­eign tour­ists arriv­ing in the US between 2001 and 2004 was observed.

How­ever, these attacks not only dam­aged the US eco­nomy (about US$ 105 bil­lion), but also eco­nom­ic activ­it­ies in oth­er coun­tries. In the Asia Pacific region, due to meas­ures taken and the expendit­ures made in the fight against ter­ror­ism, insur­ance costs and the cost of doing busi­ness increased and the pro­ductiv­ity of the region­al eco­nomy slowed down.

So many more ter­ror attacks on tour­ism facil­it­ies have occurred, one after the other:

  • The 2002 bomb­ing of the Kuta tour­ism dis­trict in Bali, Indone­sia, killed 202 people and injured 209 others.
  • In 2004, 31 people were killed and 159 people were wounded in the ter­ror­ist act against the Hilton hotel in Taba, Egypt.
  • In 2005, 57 people lost their lives and 110 people were injured in the bomb­ings of three major hotels, the Hyatt, Radis­on SAS and Days Inn, in Amman, Jordan.
  • In 2005, explo­sions at places where tour­ists were con­cen­trated in Bali, Indone­sia, caused the deaths of 20 people and injur­ing 129 people.
  • In 2005, 88 people were killed and 150 people were injured dur­ing the ter­ror­ist acts in Ghazala Gar­dens Hotel and Sharm elSheikh, the resort city in the south­ern­most point of Sinai island of Egypt.
  • In 2008, more than 602 people were killed and more than 250 people were wounded in the ter­ror­ist attack on Mar­ri­ott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • et cet­era.

Has terror always been targeted at Middle East or developing countries?

Of course not. Septem­ber 11 is the highest-pro­file example of that. In recent times espe­cially, ter­ror­ism has also tar­geted tour­ism des­tin­a­tions in Europe and oth­er developed countries.

terroris and tourism more implications
Dark times in the “city of light”, Paris.

Let’s take a brief look at some cases in Europe:

  • In 2004, 191 people were killed and about 2,000 wounded in bomb attacks at three dif­fer­ent train sta­tions in Mad­rid, Spain.
  • In 2005, 56 people were killed and 700 were injured as a res­ult of a bomb attack in Lon­don, UK.
  • In 2011, 77 people lost their lives and more than 200 people injured in the bomb attack in Oslo, Norway.
  • In 2015, 146 people lost their lives and 379 people were injured in three sep­ar­ate bomb attacks car­ried out one after anoth­er in Par­is, France.
  • In 2016, 32 people were killed and 270 people were injured dur­ing bomb attacks against an air­port and metro sta­tion in Brus­sels, Belgium.
  • In 2016, 84 people were killed and 200 people were injured as a truck ploughed through crowds of Bastille Day cel­eb­rants in Nice, France.
  • et cet­era.

The num­bers of people who died and were injured in past and recent ter­ror­ist acts in Europe and else­where show the solem­nity and sever­ity of ter­ror­ist acts. Recent ter­ror­ist acts in Europe, espe­cially in tour­ism regions, have ser­i­ously dam­aged the tour­ism eco­nomy. For example, the hotel occu­pancy rate, which was 82% a few days before the explo­sion in Brus­sels in 2016, saw a 25% drop in the week fol­low­ing. There was also a huge decline in flight reser­va­tions to Brus­sels. The after­math of the Par­is bomb­ings in 2015 saw hotel occu­pancy rates fall to 67%, a loss of 15.1% over pre­vi­ous years and air travel can­cel­la­tions skyrock­et. Sim­il­arly, as a res­ult of the explo­sion in Lon­don in 2016, hotel occu­pancy fell to 58%, a 27.7% decline.

Turkish tourism’s tussle with terror

Tur­key is at the fore­front of coun­tries that have to fight against ter­ror­ism, hav­ing fought against the Armeni­an Secret Army for the Lib­er­a­tion of Armenia (ASALA) between 1973 and 1985, and it now con­tin­ues to fight against the Partiya Kark­er­ên Kur­distanê (PKK or Kur­distan Work­ers Party), which was estab­lished in 1978. In addi­tion to the loss of more than 30,000 people’s lives in the struggle against the PKK, the Turk­ish eco­nomy has suffered major losses in almost every area, espe­cially in the tour­ism sector.

Besides the PKK’s activ­it­ies, Islam­ic State or ISIS, which emerged in Syr­ia and Iraq to Turkey’s south, has begun to organ­ise ter­ror­ist acts in Tur­key. The num­ber of ter­ror­ist acts com­mit­ted in Tur­key over the last sev­en years, espe­cially to tour­ists and in tour­ism des­tin­a­tions, has begun to increase con­sid­er­ably, as seen in table 1, espe­cially in terms of sever­ity and num­ber of deaths:

Turkish tourism and terrorism. Table 1

These attacks have had ser­i­ous effects on tour­ism rev­en­ues, the num­ber of tour­ists com­ing to the coun­try, and the aver­age expendit­ure of tour­ists, as presen­ted in Table 2:

Terrorism and tourism in Turkey. Table 2.

More cooperation, less conflict

Tour­ists are logic­al con­sumers who weigh up and decide upon products in terms of their price and per­form­ance, risk and reward. For this reas­on ter­ror­ist incid­ents in a region cause tour­ists to see the region as more risky. When we look at the rela­tion­ship between ter­ror­ism and tour­ism in this way, it is clear that terrorism’s effects on tour­ism can­not be under­es­tim­ated, and that the only way to remove these effects it to elim­in­ate terrorism.

Although ter­ror­ism can­not be abol­ished at this time, meas­ures and pre­cau­tions can be taken at nation­al and inter­na­tion­al levels to mit­ig­ate against poten­tial risks and emer­gen­cies that may be encountered in the tour­ism sec­tor. Nations that are fre­quently exposed to and struggle against ter­ror­ism should make every effort to cooper­ate. They should sup­port a com­mon defin­i­tion of ter­ror­ism accep­ted by all states; cut sup­port for states that in turn sup­port ter­ror­ism; pro­mote social peace, social justice and demo­cracy in their coun­tries; devel­op mar­ket­ing strategies, price pro­mo­tions, and pack­age tours to boost domest­ic tour­ism; and launch vari­ous pro­mo­tion­al cam­paigns to improve the coun­try’s image internationally.

Author’s note: Read­ers will be provided sources indi­vidu­ally if requested.

About the author

Ayşegül Acar on the relationship between terrorism and tourism
Ayşegül Acar

Ayşegül Acar com­pleted her under­gradu­ate stud­ies in tour­ism man­age­ment at Boğaziçi Uni­ver­sity, Tur­key before com­plet­ing her Mas­ter­’s degree at Istan­bul Uni­ver­sity in 2016. Ayşegül is pur­su­ing her Ph.D. at Istan­bul Uni­ver­sity while sim­ul­tan­eously under­tak­ing a second Mas­ter­’s with the Eco­nom­ics Depart­ment at Middle East Tech­nic­al Uni­ver­sity and work­ing as Research Assist­ant in the Depart­ment of Tour­ism Man­age­ment, Fac­ulty of Tour­ism, at Kar­abük Uni­ver­sity! Ayşegül’s research interests are the top­ics of ter­ror­ism and tour­ism, polit­ic­al instabil­ity and tour­ism, sus­tain­able tour­ism, as well as tour­ism account­ing and finance.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.