Pantanal jaguar ecotourists willing to compensate ranchers for stock losses

September 14, 2017

Wildlife ecotourists willing to compensate ranchers

Click here for your invitation to write for "Good Tourism" ... Feel free to pass it on.
Most wild­life eco­tour­ists in the Pantanal region of South Amer­ica say they are will­ing to com­pensate cattle ranch­ers for live­stock taken by wild jaguars.

This is accord­ing to a new study, “The num­bers of the beast: Valu­ation of jag­uar (Pan­thera onca) tour­ism and cattle depred­a­tion in the Brazili­an Pantanal”, by Fernando R. Tor­tato, Thi­ago J. Izzo, Rafael Hoo­gesteijn, & Car­los A. Peres pub­lished in Glob­al Eco­logy and Con­ser­va­tion.

The authors show that “jag­uar eco­tour­ism rep­res­ents a gross annu­al income of US$6,827,392 in land-use rev­en­ue across a rep­res­ent­at­ive por­tion the Brazili­an Pantanal” com­pared to “a hypo­thet­ic­al dam­age of only US$121,500 per year in bovine cattle losses”. And they claim that the loss of live­stock due to jag­uar pred­a­tion could be “com­pensated by a sys­tem of vol­un­tary dona­tions from tour­ists, ensur­ing that both tra­di­tion­al live­stock hus­bandry and eco­tour­ism can co-exist with­in the same ranches, thereby pro­mot­ing land­scape-scale jag­uar conservation”.

The research­ers sur­veyed 137 tour­ists in the study area:

Hav­ing been informed of the exist­ence of a con­flict between jag­uars and cattle ranch­ers, tour­ists became aware that observed jag­uars can take both wild and domest­ic­ated prey out­side the park, with 96% agree­ing that a com­pens­a­tion scheme would be required to cov­er the costs of jag­uar depred­a­tion on live­stock. In fact, 95% of all inform­ants believed that jag­uar tour­ism could be a tan­gible source of rev­en­ues for this com­pens­a­tion scheme and 80% agreed to, on aver­age, donate an addi­tion­al 6.8% (SD ± 3.9%) of the value of their all-inclus­ive daily rates …

Extra­pol­at­ing the sur­vey find­ings based on tour­ism num­bers for the study area, this works out to nearly three times more than the US$32 per tour­ist min­im­um dona­tion required to suf­fi­ciently com­pensate cattle ranchers.

Most ecotourists want to contribute to a scheme compensating cattle ranchers for their losses

A melan­ist­ic jag­uar, inform­ally known as a “black pan­ther”. By Ron Sing­er & the Nation­al Digit­al Lib­rary of the United States Fish and Wild­life Ser­vice via Wiki­me­dia.

The authors also con­sidered how ranch­ers might be incentiv­ised to mit­ig­ate their stock losses and pro­tect jag­uars on their prop­er­ties via a “stable com­pens­at­ory part­ner­ship” based on best man­age­ment prac­tices and bench­marks of reas­on­able expec­ted stock losses.

The Pantanal is the world’s largest trop­ic­al wet­land (between 140,000 and 195,000 sq.km) loc­ated mainly in Brazil but also por­tions of Bolivia and Paraguay. (Wiki­pe­dia)

The jag­uar (Pan­thera onca) is the only extant “big cat” feline spe­cies nat­ive to the Amer­icas. The third-largest feline spe­cies after the tiger and the lion, the jag­uar’s range extends from south­west­ern United States and Mex­ico across much of Cent­ral Amer­ica and south to Paraguay and north­ern Argen­tina. (Wiki­pe­dia)

Fea­tured image: A female jag­uar at Piquiri River, the Pantanal, Brazil. By Charles J Sharp (Sharp Pho­to­graphy) (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Wiki­me­dia.

Download

jag mastThe num­bers of the beast: Valu­ation of jag­uar (Pan­thera onca) tour­ism and cattle depred­a­tion in the Brazili­an Pantanal (PDF 2 MB; hos­ted off­s­ite) by Fernando R. Tor­tato, Thi­ago J. Izzo, Rafael Hoo­gesteijn, & Car­los A. Peres.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.