Conservationists “condemn” Philippines Tourism Sec’y for Coral World Park

June 29, 2017

Coral World Park and developments like it threaten vulnerable species, according to Philippines' conservationists. Image: Haribon

Click here for your invitation to write for "Good Tourism" ... Feel free to pass it on.
An alli­ance of loc­al con­ser­va­tion­ists have con­demned not only the pro­posed Cor­al World Park in Coron, Palawan but also Phil­ip­pines Tour­ism Sec­ret­ary Wanda Teo for her pub­lic declar­a­tion of sup­port for it.

A state­ment from the Haribon Found­a­tion for the Con­ser­va­tion of Nat­ur­al Resources and PAMANA Ka Sa Pilip­i­nas, a net­work of com­munity-based mar­ine pro­tec­ted area man­agers, asserts that “the con­struc­tion activ­ity itself and the res­ult­ing deluge of people to such a resort will have harm­ful effects to the sur­round­ing envir­on­ment, includ­ing the pleth­ora of wastes as a res­ult of tour­ism activ­it­ies that not even the best pro­tec­tion and con­ser­va­tion meas­ures can pre­vent or guard against”.

The state­ment called upon Teo to read her own Nation­al Tour­ism Devel­op­ment Plan, which they say espouses a “highly com­pet­it­ive and envir­on­ment­ally and socially respons­ible tour­ism that deliv­ers more widely dis­trib­uted income”.

Fur­ther­more, Haribon insists Teo con­sider the fol­low­ing threes points in her role as Tour­ism Secretary:

  1. Make loc­als top pri­or­ity: “Con­sider loc­al know­ledge and oppor­tun­it­ies for employ­ment. Recog­nize the rights of affected indi­gen­ous groups (i.e. Tag­banu­as) includ­ing issues about ances­tral domains and par­ti­cip­a­tion in decision-mak­ing processes.”
  2. “Pro­mote the man­age­ment of nat­ur­al hab­it­ats and eco­lo­gic­al ser­vices to enhance biod­iversity that bene­fits the entire com­munity through healthy eco­logy, eco­tour­ism and sus­tain­able livelihood.”
  3. “Con­vert tour­ism invest­ments into loc­al con­ser­va­tion actions: DOT should cap­it­al­ize on the Phil­ip­pines, as a mega-biod­i­verse coun­try and the glob­al cen­ter of mar­ine biod­iversity, by pro­mot­ing appre­ci­ation of the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment in its nat­ur­al state and under­scor­ing its life-giv­ing attributes.”

The Haribon/PAMANA state­ment came after Teo con­firmed that the planned Nick­elodeon theme park was “push­ing through”. In an inter­view with CNN Phil­ip­pines aired on June 1, she recalled the per­son­al assur­ance giv­en to her by rep­res­ent­at­ives of Viac­om Inter­na­tion­al Media Net­works (Nick­elodeon’s own­ers) and its devel­op­ment part­ner, Cor­al World Park Under­sea Resorts, that cor­als would not be harmed dur­ing the con­struc­tion of the park.

As cri­ti­cism of the plans have escal­ated, Cor­al World Park has played down the “under­sea” nature of the devel­op­ment: “The only infra­struc­ture in the water is float­ing and all devel­op­ments are on land.”

Nickelodeon cartoon characters alongside an artists' impression of part of the Coron development. Both images from NickALive blog.

Nick­elodeon car­toon char­ac­ters along­side an artists’ impres­sion of part of the Coron devel­op­ment. Both images from the ‘Nick­ALive’ blog.

In Janu­ary, Viac­om announced its col­lab­or­a­tion with Cor­al World Park to devel­op a “Nick­elodeon under­sea attrac­tion and resort [that] will be part of Cor­al World Park, a 400-hec­tare under­sea-themed mas­ter­planned devel­op­ment in [the] West­ern Phil­ip­pine province of Coron, Palawan”.

Conservationists “condemn”

The full Haribon/PAMANA state­ment, as fol­lows (word for word):

“The Haribon Found­a­tion for the Con­ser­va­tion of Nat­ur­al Resources, Inc. and PAMANA Ka Sa Pilip­i­nas, the largest net­work of com­munity-based mar­ine pro­tec­ted area man­agers con­demn Tour­ism Sec­ret­ary Wanda Teo’s pub­lic declar­a­tion of sup­port of the build­ing of the Cor­al World Park in Coron, Palawan.

“We take a stand against the build­ing of any enter­tain­ment resort com­plex in Coron, Palawan, with­in any area that is part of or near any pro­tec­ted area or nature reserve.

“The estim­ated value of lost eco­sys­tem ser­vices of Coron reefs is at $36,794 per hec­tare every year (Cost­anza, et. al, 2014) if the pro­ject pushes through. This includes for­feited fish­ing oppor­tun­it­ies for loc­al fish­ers, storm pro­tec­tion and the release of 268.8 tons of car­bon stocks per hec­tare of defor­es­ted man­grove areas (Abino et al., 2014).

“This pro­ject by Nick­elodeon and Cor­al World Park Under­sea Resorts will affect how cor­als settle and build a reef thereby threat­en­ing tens of thou­sands of mar­ine spe­cies sheltered by reefs. Need­less to say, the con­struc­tion will affect cor­als and oth­er biod­iversity which rely heav­ily on their tact­ile and aur­al sens­ory to nav­ig­ate and settle on reefs.

“The pres­ence of Anac­ro­pora spinosa, an endem­ic cor­al gives a con­crete pic­ture to the construction’s poten­tial impacts. The Phil­ip­pines has 29 of the 50 Evol­u­tion­ar­ily Dis­tinct and Glob­ally Endangered (EDGE) Cor­al Reef spe­cies, includ­ing the eleg­ance cor­al (Catalaphyl­lia jardinei), con­sidered Vul­ner­able by Phil­ip­pine cor­al sci­ent­ists and the Inter­na­tion­al Uni­on for Con­ser­va­tion of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Spe­cies. Some of which are found in Coron.

Conservationist groups, including Haribon, condemn Philippine Tourism Sec’y for the Coral World Park development in Coron, Palawan. Image: Haribon

Con­ser­va­tion­ist groups, includ­ing Haribon, con­demn Phil­ip­pine Tour­ism Sec­ret­ary Wanda Teo for the pro­posed Cor­al World Park devel­op­ment in Coron, Palawan. Image: Haribon

“These coastal hab­it­ats are feed­ing and nurs­ery grounds for 1,881 cor­al reef asso­ci­ated fishes. At least two spe­cies of blen­nies, a small trop­ic­al reef-dwell­ing fish, are found only in the Calami­anes Island, includ­ing Coron, in the Phil­ip­pines such as the Ecseni­us kur­ti and E. tri­col­or (Allen et al. 2003). The fact that “devel­op­ment” pro­jects fail to con­sider the cost of evol­u­tion­ary his­tory that will be lost when the plan gets a green light is devastating.

“There are tour­ists who put more premi­um on nat­ur­al and cul­tur­al her­it­age – the ideal for eco­tour­ism. Con­sumers (read: tour­ists) who sup­port eco-tour­ism will nor­mally expect and prefer the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment, not man­made or arti­fi­cial struc­tures, and there­fore engage in increas­ingly pop­u­lar activ­it­ies such as hik­ing, river raft­ing, scuba diving and wild­life watching.

“Ulti­mately, we invite Sec. Teo to per­use her office’s Nation­al Tour­ism Devel­op­ment Plan, which espouses a “highly com­pet­it­ive and envir­on­ment­ally and socially respons­ible tour­ism that deliv­ers more widely dis­trib­uted income.”

“Haribon calls on Sec. Teo to con­sider the following:

  1. “Put the loc­als on top pri­or­ity (i.e. gov­ernance): Con­sider loc­al know­ledge and oppor­tun­it­ies for employ­ment. Recog­nize the rights of affected indi­gen­ous groups (i.e. Tag­banu­as) includ­ing issues about ances­tral domains and par­ti­cip­a­tion in decision-mak­ing processes.
  2. “Pro­mote the man­age­ment of nat­ur­al hab­it­ats and eco­lo­gic­al ser­vices (i.e. hab­it­at man­age­ment) to enhance biod­iversity that bene­fits the entire com­munity through healthy eco­logy, eco­tour­ism and sus­tain­able livelihood.
  3. “Con­vert tour­ism invest­ments into loc­al con­ser­va­tion actions: DOT should cap­it­al­ize on the Phil­ip­pines, as a mega-biod­i­verse coun­try and the glob­al cen­ter of mar­ine biod­iversity, by pro­mot­ing appre­ci­ation of the nat­ur­al envir­on­ment in its nat­ur­al state and under­scor­ing its life-giv­ing attributes.”

Fea­tured image: A res­id­ent of Coron, the eleg­ance cor­al (Catalaphyl­lia jardinei) is con­sidered a vul­ner­able spe­cies. (Haribon)

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.